Seminar XXIII: The Sinthome or Joyce and the Sinthome: 1975-1976: beginning on November 18th 1975 : Jacques Lacan
by Julia Evans on November 18, 1975
Index
Addenda!
There are two English translations available.
1) Cormac Gallagher’s translation from original tapes.
2) Adrian Price’s translation from Jacques-Alain Miller’s edited text and with his chapter headings
3) In French : Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller
4) Page numbers in the different editions
5) Quotes & References to this seminar
6) Notes
7) Related Texts
Addenda
Presentation on 20thJanuary 1976
See Presentation at Lacan’s Seminar : 20th January 1976 (Paris) : Jacques Aubert or here
Commentary
Chomsky with Joyce : 11th April 2005 (Paris) : Éric Laurent or here
Passed Over Stories : 6th November 2005 (Paris) : Jacques Aubert or here
Reading Notes
Reading Notes to Jacques Lacan’s Seminar XXIII : 2005 : Jacques Aubert or here
1) Cormac Gallagher’s translation, from original tapes,
available at wwwLacaninIreland.com : Here is in two parts:
i) Joyce and the Sinthome Part 1 : Available here
Content:
I Wednesday 18th November 1975
II Wednesday 9th December 1975
III Wednesday 16th December 1975
IV Wednesday 13th January 1976
V Wednesday 20th January 1976
ii) Joyce and the Sinthome Part 2 : Available here
Content:
VI Wednesday 10th February 1976
VII Wednesday 17th February 1976
VIII Wednesday 9th March 1976:
IX Wednesday 16th March 1976
– Translation Seminar XXIII : 16th March 1976 : CGpIX 9 translation of Trieb as pulsion not dérive
X Wednesday 13th April 1976
XI Wednesday 11th May 1976
2) Translation by Adrian Price : Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller :
The Sinthome – The Seminar of Jacques Lacan – Book XXIII : Polity Press 2016
Chapter Headings as defined by Jacques-Alain Miller
Section title : The Spirit of the Knots
Seminar XXIII :18th November 1975 : Chapter I : On the Logical Use of the Sinthome
Or Freud with Joyce
Sub-headings : Joyce, that father-tasked wretch
The body : form and the fact of saying
The father is a sinthome
On the four-component Borromean link
On an art that foils the truth of the sinthome
Seminar XXIII : 9th December 1975 : Chapter II : On what makes a Hole in the Real
Sub-headings : The fourth ring
A geometry forbidden to the imaginary
Meeting Chomsky
No hope of escaping from feeble-mindedness
On an art that substantializes the symptom
Seminar XXIII : 16th December 1975 : Chapter III : On the knot as the subject’s support
Sub-headings : Soury and Thomé
Knot and Know
Personality and paranoia
The sinthome and the unconscious
Meaning and jouissance
Section Title : The Joyce Trail
Seminar XXIII : 13th January 1976 : Chapter IV : Joyce and the Fox Riddle
Sub-headings : Home truths ticking over
The real bears no meaning
Mentality and the adoration of the body
Joyce deep-rooted in the father he disowns
Making a splice between sinthome and jouissance
Seminar XXIII : 20th January 1976 : Additional Session
The following week: Adjournment to eftsoons
Jacques Aubert’s presentation
Seminar XXIII : 10th February 1976 : Chapter V : Was Joyce mad?
Sub-headings : The jouissance of the real
Redemption or castration
The real within the entanglements of the true
Compensating for a de facto Verwerfung
The value of the proper noun
Seminar XXIII : 17th February 1976 : Joyce and Imposed Words
Sub-headings : Lacan’s knot
Knots and links
Slips of the knot mended by the sinthome
Sexual equivalence = non-relation
Symptomatic woman, ravaging man
Section Title : The Invention of the Real
Seminar XXIII : 9th March 1976 : Chapter VII : On a Fallace that vouches for the Real
Sub-headings : The all and the set
Borromean duality
Orientation and colour
Syntax and equivoque
The phallus and the real
Seminar XXIII : 16th March 1976 : Chapter VIII : On Sens, Sex, and the Real
Sub-headings : Orientation of the real, foreclosure of sens
The real is tied to nothing
Joyce’s sinthome is unanalysable
The phallic function, between fantasy and phonation
Folisophy
Seminar XXIII : 13th April 1976 : Chapter IX : From the Unconscious to the Real
Sub-headings : A new type of idea
Energetics and the real
Meaning is the Other of the real
The Name-of-the-father: bypassing it, making use of it
The real is lawless
Section Title : By Way of Conclusion
Seminar XXIII : 11th May 1976 : Chapter X : The Writing of the Ego
Sub-headings : What philosophy lacks, and what makes up for it
On a logic of bags and cords
Disentangling oneself from the idea of eternity
On a body dropped like a fruit peel
What Joyce’s knot lacks, and what rectifies it
Seminar XXIII : Note by Jacques-Alain Miller, 7th January 2005
Seminar XXIII : Retroactive Note by Jacques-Alain Miller, 17th January 2005
Section Title : Appendices
Joyce the Symptom : Jacques Lacan : Lecture delivered on 16th June 1975 : See here
Presentation at Lacan’s Seminar : Jacques Aubert : Delivered on 20th January 1976
Reading Notes : Jacques Aubert
A Note Threaded Stitch by Stitch : Jacques-Alain Miller : 27th January 2005
Translator’s Notes : Adrian Price
Index
3) In French : Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller
LACAN, J.: Le séminaire livre XXIII : Le sinthome: Paris , Seuil 2005
4) Page numbers in the 3 editions of Seminar XXIII
in Cormac Gallagher’s translation {CGp}, Adrian Price’s translation {APp} & the French, 2005, edition {Fp} of Seminar XXIII
Note: the number of sessions or chapters differ in Cormac Gallagher’s translation & Adrian Price’s
I Wednesday 18th November 1975 : CGpI1 : APp3
Reference : p4 of Cormac Gallagher : ‘I enunciated the Symbolic, the Imaginary and the Real in ‘54’ : See Conference Report, SIR : Inaugural meeting of SFP, Paris : 8th July 1953 : Jacques Lacan or here
II Wednesday 9th December 1975 : CGpII I : APp17
– Lacan, 2005a, Fp. 27–43 = Seminar XXIII : 9th December 1975 : CGpII IV
III Wednesday 16th December 1975 : CGpIII I : APp33
– Lacan, J, 2005, Fp. 56: “the subject who is sustained by the parlêtre, which is what I denote as the unconscious”. = Seminar XXIII : 16th December 1975 : CGpIII 13
Quotes from pIII 13 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation : Speaking through One’s Symptom, Speaking through One’s Body : 7th July 2012 (Lausanne) & 23rd November 2013 (Buenos Aires) : Éric Laurent or here
– Quotes from pIII 13 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation : Speaking through One’s Symptom, Speaking through One’s Body : 7th July 2012 (Lausanne) & 23rd November 2013 (Buenos Aires) : Éric Laurent or here
IV Wednesday 13th January 1976 : CGpIV I : APp47 – Ch IV
– Fp. 66 = Seminar XXIII : 13th January 1976 : CGpIV 6 – 7
V Wednesday 20th January 1976 : CGpV I : APp59 – Appendix to ChIV plus Jacques Aubert’s presentation APp149
VI Wednesday 10th February 1976 : CGpVI I : APp62 – Ch V
– Lacan, 2005a, Fp. 87 = Seminar XXIII : 10th February 1976 : CGpVI 12
VII Wednesday 17th February 1976 : CGpVII I : APp74 – ChVI
VIII Wednesday 9th March 1976 : CGpVIII I : APp87 – Ch VII
– Quotes from pVIII 1 & pVIII 2 & pVIII 2-3 & pVIII 4 & pVIII 5 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation in, Speaking through One’s Symptom, Speaking through One’s Body : 7th July 2012 (Lausanne) & 23rd November 2013 (Buenos Aires) : Éric Laurent or here
Reference, pVIII 1 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation :Lituraterre: 12th May 1971: Jacques Lacan or here
pVIII 1 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation : The Portrait of Dora : Hélène Cixous
IX Wednesday 16th March 1976 : CGpIX I : APp100 – Ch VIII
X Wednesday 13th April 1976 : CGpX I : APp110 – Ch IX
XI Wednesday 11th May 1976 : CGpXI I : APp123 – Ch X
– Fp148 of 2005 = 11th May 1976 : CGpXI 12
– The session given on 16th June 1975 is translated. Details given Joyce the Symptom : 16th June 1975 : Jacques Lacan or here
5) Quotes & References to this seminar :
– Knot and Name-of-the-Father: July 2006: Pierre Skriabine See here
____________________________
– pX 11-12 : Autism : 13th July 2006 (Rome) : Virginio Baio See here
_____________________________
– From notes to “Discreet Signs in Ordinary Psychoses – Clinic and Treatment”, Towards the NLS Congress in Dublin July 2016 : 10th October 2015 : Yves Vanderveken and available here
This is precisely what Jacques Lacan invited us to do with the Name-of-the-Father in his Seminar (XXIII), Le sinthome, p.136. Details of the English translation are given Seminar XXIII: The Sinthome or Joyce and the Sinthome: 1975-1976: beginning on November 18th 1975 : Jacques Lacan or here though the session date or page number is unknown. Probably : In Seminar XXIII, Lacan points out that “psychoanalysis, with its success, demonstrates that one can also get rid of the Name-of–the-father. One can get rid of it (ignore it: s’en passer) on condition one makes use of it (s’en server).” pX 11-12 Of Cormac Gallagher – see above – p 136 of French edition : p116 of Adrian Price’s translation : 13th April 1976
________________________________
– Quote from Seminar XXIII : 18th November 1975 : pI 6-7 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation in ‘Contemporary Urgencies’ by Geert Hoornaert, 18th March 2019. This text can be found 1) can be found in the blog leading to the June 2019 conference of the NLS, ‘Urgent!’ : https://www.nlscongress2019.com/new-blog/contemporary-urgencies
or on the New Lacanian School’s web-site, in Messenger : 3024 – 2019-03-18 – TIDBITS – Geert Hoornaert – Towards the NLS Congress 2019 or http://www.amp-nls.org/page/gb/49/nls-messager/0/2018-2019/3669
From Hoornaert : In November 1975, did not Lacan specify this particular way, in this lesson on Joyce to which Jacques-Alain Miller gave the title, “Of the Logical Use of the Sinthome”? “One has to choose the path by which to capture the truth […] The right way is the one that, when the nature of the sinthome has been recognized, doesn’t shrink from using it logically, that is, from using it to the point of reaching its real, at the end of which it is sated.” [3] 3 Lacan, J., The Sinthome, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XXIII, tr. A.R. Price, Polity, Cambridge, 2016, p. 7.
Seminar XXIII : 18th November 1975 : Quote from pI 6-7 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation (www.LacaninIreland.com) : It is certain that these two terms could be named differently. I named them thus in function of two aspects offered to the art of Joyce, which is going to occupy us this year by reason of what I said earlier, that I introduced and that I could do no better than to name him, this sinthome, because he deserves it, with the name that suits him by displacing in it, as I said the spelling, the two, the two spellings that concern him, But it is a fact that he chooses. In doing so he is like me, a heretic. For haeresis is indeed here what specifies the heretic. One must choose the path along which the truth must be taken. And this all the more that once the choice has been made, this does not prevent anyone from submitting it to confirmation, namely, being properly a heretic; the one who because of having well recognised the nature of the sinthome, does not spare himself using it logically, namely, to the point of reaching its Real at the end of which he is no longer thirsty. Yes. Of course he did this at first sight. because you could to have had a worse start than him.
_____________________________________
-Seminar XXIII : 10th February 1976
Jacques Lacan cites “Inspired” writings: Schizography : 12th November 1931 : Jacques Lacan : See here for quotation of pVI 2 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation
______________________________________
– Seminar XXIII : 13th April 1976 : From : NLS-Messager, Subject: [nls-messager] 3210.en/ Premiere Event. The Pass in Our School – A Word from Bernard Seynhaeve – Conference 29/09 in Ghent, Date: 2 September 2019 at 15:03:12 BST, Towards the New Lacanian School’s 2020 conference : Available here :
It will rather be a question of knotting three elements, three events, three important points related to the training of the psychoanalyst oriented by Lacan’s teaching:
– The testimony of the two AS in practice in our School;
– the next Congress of the NLS whose theme is (logically) that of “Interpretation”;
– and the place of the bodies – that of the analysand and the analyst (“the psychoanalyst is a sinthome”1) – or that which is knotted from the body and from lalangue in the analytic cure, which was the strong point of the debate in Tel Aviv.
Footnote
1 Cf. p 116 of Adrian Price’s translation : p9-10, ch X of Cormac Gallagher’s translation : QUESTIONS
-J. Lacan: If psychoanalysis, this is put to me as a question, is a sinthome – I did not say that psychoanalysis was a sinthome – is not what you were doing with your knot and your mathemes, deciphering, with as consequence the dissipating of its signification?
(154) I do not think that psychoanalysis is a sinthome. I think. that psychoanalysis is a practice whose efficaciousness, which after all is quite tangible, implies, implies that I make what is called my knot, is that not so; namely, this triple (triple)knot. Implies the following, for me, and this is why l am suspending this approach of this third which is distinguished from reality and that I call the Real, this is why I cannot say I thinkbecause it is a thinking that is still completely closed, namely, in the final term enigmatic.
[p10] The distinction of the Real as compared to reality is something which I am not sure is to be confused with, I will say, the proper value that I give to the term Real.
The Real being deprived of meaning, I am not sure that the meaning of this Real could not be illuminated by being held to be nothing less than a sinthome. This is what I respond to the question that is put to me.
It is in the measure that I believe I am able, first, from something which is a crude topology, to support what is at stake. Namely, the very function of the Real as distinguished, distinguished by me from what I believe I can hold with certainty- with certainty because I am practiced in it from the term of Unconscious, is that not so? – it is in this measure, and in the measure that the Unconscious is not without a reference to the body, that I think that the function of the Real can be distinguished from it.
6) Notes
– The session given on 16th June 1975 is translated. Details given Joyce the Symptom : 16th June 1975 : Jacques Lacan or here
– Seminar XXIII : 18th November 1975
Quote from p4 & p5 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation in A Lacanian approach to clinical diagnosis and addiction : 2002 : Rik Loose or here
Quote from pII 4 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation, see Chomsky with Joyce : 11th April 2005 (Paris) : Éric Laurent or here
Quote from p9-10 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation in The Logic and Surprises of Supervision at the Time of the Parlêtre : 7th March 2015 (Italy) : Éric Laurent or here
Comment on p11 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation : But for this speech to resonate, for it to be consonant with, to use another word of the sinthome madaquin, for it to consonate, the body must be sensitive to it. :
Note by Bruno de Florence on 30th November 2017 :
BdF MADAQUIN: which is like a saying by St Tomas d’Aquin (Thomas Aquinas for you English people).
JE The neologism sinthomasaquinian refers to “St. Thomas Aquinas” and, probably, the Thomistic theory of beauty.
&
CGp11 : is something of the order of a frog who wants to make himself as big as an ox. We know the effects from a fable. :
BdF Reference to FROG & OX: very popular 17th tale by Jean de la Fontaine, all French school kids know it, La Grenouille qui veut se faire aussi grosse que le Bœuf, English translation on http://lafontaine.mmlc.northwestern.edu/fables/grenouille_boeuf_en.html
See Towards the 11th Clinical Study-Days: Conference “The Ego Of The Obsessional” : 22nd October 2017 (New York) : Gil Caroz or here for details of the quote.
– Seminar XXIII : 9th December 1975
pII IX of Cormac Gallagher’s translation quoted, see The Urgency of Mourning : 28th March 2019 : Michele Laboureur or here
– Seminar XXIII : 16th December 1975
pIII 13 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation quoted in The European space: its articulation, its passions : 7th January 2019 : Marco Focchi or here
– Seminar XXIII : 20th January 1976 :
pV4 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation :
He cannot failto be sensitive to the fact that it deals with an arrangement that starts from a favourite quotation of the father, a quotation from a literary text that had had, to all appearances, certain effects on him.
(72) And this text is to be found on page 93 of the Penguin edition:
-Nathan ‘s voice! His son’s voice! I hear the voice of Nathan who left his father to die of grief and misery in my arms, who left the house of his father and left the God of his father.
We see that what returns here is slightly different.
Fuller quote in : Passed Over Stories : 6th November 2005 (Paris) : Jacques Aubert or here
-Seminar XXIII : 10th February 1976
– Quote from Jack Stone’s Joyce/Lacan/SintHome Page : published at http://web.missouri.edu : here : Translated by Jack Stone :
“There is a dynamic of knots; it serves for nothing (sert á rien), but, finally, it grips (serre).”–Jacques Lacan, Le Sinthome : Session of 10th February 1976
Jacques Lacan cites “Inspired” writings: Schizography : 12th November 1931 : Jacques Lacan : See here for quotation of pVI 2 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation
pVI 12 cited, see Chomsky with Joyce : 11th April 2005 (Paris) : Éric Laurent or here
– Seminar XXIII : 17th February 1976 :
Jacques Lacan comments on the following case study :
A Lacanian Psychosis: 12th February 1976: An encounter between Gérard Primeau & Jacques Lacan : Information & availability here
The full quote of this commentary is available Teachings of the Case Presentation : 1977 : Jacques-Alain Miller or here
James Joyce’s relation to his schizophrenic daughter Lucia. : pVII 6, VII 7, VII 8-9 & Diagram VII-6 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation
– Seminar XXIII : 9th March 1976
pXIII 2 : So the aforesaid Hélène Cixous had already produced, it appears – for my part it had remained a little vague in my memory – had already produced, it appears in the out-of-print issue of Littutaterre, to remind myself of it, I was completely ignorant of it, that I had produced Litturaterre. In this out-of-print issue, which will not make it easy for you rediscover it, except for those who already have it, she produced a little note on Dora. And then, since that, she has made a play out of it, The Portrait of Dora.
pXIII 13 : The notion of couple, of coloured couple, is there to suggest that in sex, there is nothing more than, I would say, the being of colour. Which in itself suggests that there can be woman the colour of man, I will say, or man the colour of woman. The sexes on this occasion, if we support with the red ring wht is involved in the Symbolic, the sexes on this occasion are opposed as Imaginary and Real, as Idea and Impossible to take up again in my terms.
pXIII 15 : The Meaning (or Signification) of the Phallus (Munich): 9th May 1958 : Jacques Lacan : Notes & availability here
Seminar XXIII : 16th March 1976
The Realm of The Sense (film) : 1976 : Nagisa Oshima or here
pIX 3 : The metaphor indicates nothing but that : the sexual relationship.
pIX 7 : Seminar Encore : Seminar XX: Encore: 1972 – 1973: From 12th December 1972 : Jacques Lacan : Notes & availability here
pIX 9 : Finnegans Wake
pIX 10 : Except for the fact, he says, and this is how this Finnegans Wake is constructed, that the dreamer in it is not any particular character, it is the dream itself. It is here in this way that Joyce slides, slides, slides towards Jung. Slides towards the collective unconscious of which there is no better proof, there is no better proof than Joyce, that the collective unconscious is a sinthome. For one cannot say that Finnegans Wake, in his imagination, is not part of this sinthome.
pIX 13 : Eve from Genesis, The Bible :
Encore : Seminar XX: Encore: 1972 – 1973: From 12th December 1972 : Jacques Lacan : Notes & availability here :
The Book of Wisdom, The Bible
Seminar XXIII : 13th April 1976
pX 5 The Project for a Scientific Psychology: 23rd & 25th September & 5th October 1895: Sigmund Freud or here
pX 6 : The Freudian Thing or the Meaning of the Return to Freud in Psychoanalysis: 7th November 1955 : Jacques Lacan : Also read on 21st December 1955 as part of Seminar III : For availability see Écrits : 1966 : Jacques Lacan or here
pX 10 : It is in the measure that I believe I am able, first, from something which is a crude topology, to support what is at stake. Namely, the very function of the Real as distinguished, distinguished by me from what I believe I can hold with certainty – with certainty because I am practiced in it from the term of Unconscious, is that not so – it is in this measure, and in the measure that the Unconscious is not without a reference to the body, that I think that the function of the Real can be distinguished from it.
pX 11 : p 136 of French edition : p116 of Adrian Price’s translation : 13th April 1976 : From Cormac Gallagher : Question : If according to Genesis – I am reading the things that people have been good enough to write to me, it is not the worst way to do it given what I have said: that the Real is linked to writing – if according to genesis as translated by André Chouraqui, God created a help for man, a help against him, what about the psychoanalyst as a help against?
- Lacan: I think that effectively the psychoanalyst cannot conceive of himself otherwise than as a sinthome. It is not psychoanalysis that is a sinthome, it is the psychoanalyst. That is how I will reply to what was put to me as a question earlier. The fact is that it is the psychoanalyst who is, when all is said and done, a help of whom, in the terms of Genesis, one can say that that he is in short a reversal (retournement). Since moreover the Other of the Other is, what I have just defined now as the little hole there. That the little hole might be able to provide a help all by itself, [pX 12] it is precisely in this that the hypothesis of the Unconscious has its support. The hypothesis of the Unconscious as Freud underlines, is something which, which cannot hold up except by supposing the Name-of-the-Father. Supposing the Name-of-the-Father, certainly is God. It is in this that, that psychoanalysis, by succeeding, proves that one can moreover do without the Name-of-the-Father. One can moreover do without it provided one makes use of it.
pX10-11 of Cormac Gallagher’s translation : See above or Passed Over Stories : 6th November 2005 (Paris) : Jacques Aubert or here for fuller quote.
pX 13 : I speak about the Real as impossible in the measure that, that I believe, precisely, that the Real – anyway, I believe, if it is my symptom, tell me – where I believe that the Real, that the real is, has to be said, lawless.
The true Real implies, implies the absence of law.
Seminar XXIII : 11th May 1976
pXI 2 : Finnegans Wake : Clive Hart’s Structure in James Joyce’
pXI 12 : Totem and Taboo: 1912-1913 : Sigmund Freud
You will find Freud’s paper in English with the original German text laid out in the right hand column : published by www.Freud2Lacan.com : available here
pXI 14 : But it is a way of articulating precisely the fact that all human sexuality is perverse if we clearly follow what Freud says. He never succeeded in conceiving of the aforesaid sexuality otherwise than as perverse. [See notes to Seminar VII] And this indeed is why I question what I would call the fecundity of psychoanalysis.
You have heard me state very often that psychoanalysis had not even been capable of inventing a new perversion. It’s sad!
pXI 16 : You must indeed have realised that what I told you of the relationships of man to his body and which depend entirely on what if have told you: in the fact that man says he has the body , his body, he has. Already to say his, is to say that he possesses it, of course, like a piece of furniture. And that this has nothing to do with anything whatsoever that allows the subject to be strictly defined. The subject is only defined in a correct way from what ensures the relationship, form what ensures that a subject is a signifier in so far as he is represented to another signifier.
Seminar XXIII : 16th June 1975
– The session given on 16th June 1975 is translated. Details given Joyce the Symptom : 16th June 1975 : Jacques Lacan or here
7) Related texts
Joyce the Symptôm (Sinthôme) I & II : 16th June 1975 : Jacques Lacan or here (Translations of both available)
Geneva lecture on the symptom: 4th October1975: Jacques Lacan or here
See Seminar XXIII: The Sinthome or Joyce and the Sinthome: 1975-1976: beginning on November 18th 1975 : Jacques Lacan or here for information & availability
Yale University: 24th November 1975: Conversation with Students: Jacques Lacan or here
Yale University: 24th November 1975: ‘Kanzer Seminar’: Jacques Lacan or here
Yale University: 24th November 1975: Law School Auditorium: Jacques Lacan or here
Columbia University Auditorium, School of International Affairs: 1st December 1975: Jacques Lacan or here
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, December 2, 1975: Jacques Lacan or here
Presentation at Lacan’s Seminar : 20th January 1976 (Paris) : Jacques Aubert or here
Presentation: “On James Joyce as Symptom” : 24th January 1976 (Nice) : Jacques Lacan or here
A Lacanian Psychosis: 12th February 1976: An encounter between Gérard Primeau & Jacques Lacan or here
Chomsky with Joyce : 11th April 2005 (Paris) : Éric Laurent or here
Reading Notes to Jacques Lacan’s Seminar XXIII : 2005 : Jacques Aubert or here
.
An increasing number of the texts with unavailable links, can now be found at www.LacanianWorksExchange.net. If not then contact Julia Evans to request a particular text or book.
.
Practicing Lacanian Psychoanalyst, Sandwich in Kent & London
.
Other texts
Of the clinic here
Ordinary Psychosis here
Use of power here
Some Lacanian History : here
Topology : here
Lacanian Transmission : here
By Sigmund Freud here
Notes on texts by Sigmund Freud : here
By Jacques Lacan here
Notes on texts by Jacques Lacan here
By Jacques Aubert here
By Julia Evans here